• The time has come to vote for the NEW name of the site! Check out the stickied thread in TLR. Get your votes in now, poll will be closing in six days.

Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry

bnew

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 3, 2025
Messages
279
Daps
340

Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry​


Meta’s former head of global affairs said asking for permission from rights owners to train models would “basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight.”

by
Mia Sato

May 26, 2025, 9:36 AM EDT

https://www.theverge.com/news/674366/nick-clegg-uk-ai-artists-policy-letter#comments

207207

Comments (All New)


Senate Intelligence Committee hearing with top executives at Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft about foreign election interference

Mia Sato

As policy makers in the UK weigh how to regulate the AI industry, Nick Clegg, former UK deputy prime minister and former Meta executive, claimed a push for artist consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.

Speaking at an event promoting his new book, Clegg said the creative community should have the right to opt out of having their work used to train AI models. But he claimed it wasn’t feasible to ask for consent before ingesting their work first.

“I think the creative community wants to go a step further,” Clegg said according to The Times. “Quite a lot of voices say, ‘You can only train on my content, [if you] first ask’. And I have to say that strikes me as somewhat implausible because these systems train on vast amounts of data.”

“I just don’t know how you go around, asking everyone first. I just don’t see how that would work,” Clegg said. “And by the way if you did it in Britain and no one else did it, you would basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight.”

The comments follow a back-and-forth in Parliament over new legislation that aims to give creative industries more insight into how their work is used by AI companies. An amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill would require technology companies to disclose what copyrighted works were used to train AI models. Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Elton John, and Andrew Lloyd Webber are among the hundreds of musicians, writers, designers, and journalists who signed an open letter in support of the amendment earlier in May.

The amendment — introduced by Beeban Kidron, who is also a film producer and director — has bounced around gaining support. But on Thursday members of parliament rejected the proposal, with technology secretary Peter Kyle saying the “Britain’s economy needs both [AI and creative] sectors to succeed and to prosper.” Kidron and others have said a transparency requirement would allow copyright law to be enforced, and that AI companies would be less likely to “steal” work in the first place if they are required to disclose what content they used to train models.

In an op-ed in the Guardian Kidron promised that “the fight isn’t over yet,” as the Data (Use and Access) Bill returns to the House of Lords in early June.
 

1/51
🇺 keithwdickinson.bsky.social
Today is a day when arts degrees are worthless, but the product of those degrees is so valuable it would kill an entire industry if they were made to pay for it.
bafkreihcf6leitqccs42dotxzpar57qdq3scdt3isuw2mdx7bxtatubrtm@jpeg

https://buff.ly/82rxqfi

[QUOTED POST]
🇺 ‪@theverge.com‬
Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry
bafkreihcf6leitqccs42dotxzpar57qdq3scdt3isuw2mdx7bxtatubrtm@jpeg


2/51
🇺 adamt1966.bsky.social
Anyone can make a profit selling things you've stolen.

If that's the only business model for AI, they don't have a business.

3/51
🇺 vincentbecherer.bsky.social
“People’s labor is so valuable to our business, we can’t afford to fairly pay them for it.”

I feel like there’s a word for that…

4/51
🇺 johnvoltz.bsky.social
When your biz model depends on stealing from little bits from many people, maybe the problem is the biz model, not people saying don’t steal, pay me.

5/51
🇺 davenewb.bsky.social
It's ironic that an industry being funded by billions each year has to be subsidized by starving artists.

6/51
🇺 kairaloi.bsky.social
All I can say is....

7/51
🇺 pndrp.bsky.social
If I want to train my mind on material I must pay for that material. If a billion dollar entity wants to train its mind on material it must be able to do it for free. I must pay the billion dollar entity to use material created by its mind.

8/51
🇺 jazzaoxon.bsky.social
Does Clegg understand AI and how a human brain works?

9/51
🇺 jeremyschultz.bsky.social
What a great observation. It's worth noting that one big reason why the value is so high is because they want to eat the entire creative output that's on the Internet.

10/51
🇺 stemthebleeding.bsky.social

bafkreifxhwlb6t7ur5zuwxwiftpptugpa7odkg7avfagjxyacxo35q5efa@jpeg


11/51
🇺 cassandrableigh.bsky.social
Pirates don't pay for anything.

12/51
🇺 janmaxwell.bsky.social
So, I want to start a company where I steal your work, and I will complain bitterly if you don't like that. So, can I go to Nick's house and steal all of his stuff, then complain bitterly if he wants me to pay for what I took? How would he feel about that?

13/51
🇺 wes0311.bsky.social
Argument sounds like one southern plantation owners would have made in 1859

14/51
🇺 livin-in-your-shed.bsky.social
Why aren’t the music companies going scorched earth on the AI companies like they did to the 12 year olds who illegally downloaded a shitty ass metallica album circa 2001?

15/51
🇺 tidinzeo.bsky.social
If it would kill the ‘ai industry’ then the ‘ai industry’ should die.

16/51
🇺 stringerbelly.bsky.social
There's a whole lot of people looking for the fastest way to get your money into their pockets.

Clegg is doing quite well out of his 15 minutes as Lib Dem leader.

17/51
🇺 derorfa.bsky.social
Tbf. That is the core of capitalism. And when societies put up rules to channel this into innovation and raising efficiency it can do a lot of good.

The problem is that those with the deepest pockets tricked societies into thinking rules are bad. Or worse, that they should not apply to them.

18/51
🇺 stringerbelly.bsky.social
I don't think it was the burn I intended it to be, should he ever read it.

Foiled again, damn you Clegg!

19/51
🇺 sclisa.bsky.social
Kill it then. No sympathy. AI has its place but it is really out of control. The data is now crap. I fact check-- it makes stuff up.

20/51
🇺 jazzaoxon.bsky.social
AI is a tool to be used to assist us, not to steal from us.

21/51
🇺 danjohnston.uk
He says it like it's a bad thing??

22/51
🇺 thelordgod.bsky.social
This is a great encapsulation.

23/51
🇺 drjeff.bsky.social
www.gov.ie/en/departmen...

24/51
🇺 jackprestonking.bsky.social
Great point.

25/51
🇺 t-is-always-angry.bsky.social
It would kill an industry to pay for what they so brazenly steal?

Good. Kill it.

That's not an industry. That's an organized theft ring.

26/51
🇺 olddogandgrump.bsky.social
If any business based on taking the output of other businesses and not paying for them is not a sustainable business. And we don't allow it. That's the whole point of trademark and copyright law.

AI can feck off.

27/51
🇺 jazzaoxon.bsky.social
👍

28/51
🇺 chuckell.bsky.social
If artists could kill "the AI industry" I would happily take up arms (aka a paintbrush)

29/51
🇺 jazzaoxon.bsky.social
Don't let AI steal your paintings!

30/51
🇺 rpmadmsu.bsky.social


31/51
🇺 turbosnail432.bsky.social
if thats how its going to be digital piracy should be legal. reparations for anyone who had jail time or fine, losing up public domain laws, cutting tasks forces that work on the issue. or maybe they could just pay the artists

32/51
🇺 paraseptic.bsky.social
Imagine a shop that sold only stolen goods

And when people tell them to stop stealing stuff they go

"Our shop is built off of stealing things! If we stopped now we would be out of business!"

That would never happen because society values property way more than human expression.

33/51
🇺 salinger.bsky.social
Fantastic. Let’s kill the AI industry.

34/51
🇺 clarkes428.bsky.social
So, it would kill the industry? Okay then...

35/51
🇺 patnode.bsky.social
Business community: it’s just too hard to do the right thing, so please let us steal from you. (But you can’t steal from us. )

36/51
🇺 spacehippieface.bsky.social
LET IT DIE
LET IT DIE
LET IT SHRIVEL UP AND DIE

37/51
🇺 fresistl.bsky.social
Excellent. RIP AI. You are not needed nor welcomed. We are fine with human intelligence. You know, the kind that actually created AI.

38/51
🇺 jazzaoxon.bsky.social
Human's have billions of neurons in our brains. AI doen't. Doubt it'll ever catch up.

39/51
🇺 fresistl.bsky.social
Treat new tech like we treat new drugs. Test and evaluate first. If we did that with social media we would have done the following:
1. No accounts or access for minors;
2. No algorithms;
3. Required truth in statements. Three strike rule.

40/51
🇺 tykebrahe.bsky.social
So they should just bugger off then?

In any other realm this would be copyright fraud but because it will help AI it’s alright then ?

41/51
🇺 fll2.bsky.social
So theft is ok is what the moron is saying.

42/51
🇺 kimnoreen.bsky.social
The AI industry deserves to die.

43/51
🇺 williamthecat.bsky.social
Is it okay to rob a bank as long as i can show that I'm using the money to finance my start up?

44/51
🇺 x---factor.bsky.social
Paying uber drivers fair wages would destroy the industry - a familiar refrain from the C suite

45/51
🇺 mattpez.bsky.social
it's almost as if capitalists talk complete bollocks

46/51
🇺 johnw60.bsky.social
Well I ain‘t gonna work on Cleggy‘s farm no more.
He hands me a novel, he hands me a rhyme.
He asks Sergy Brin if he’s having a good time.
He tweaks Madame Bovary ,as she walks out the door.
I ain’t gonna work on Cleggy‘s bot farm
no more.

47/51
🇺 heib20.bsky.social
AI should pay if they want to use an artist’s work. It’s not just about fairness but also about the integrity of how a piece of work is used. Why wouldn’t the artist expect to have a say in how their work is used & receive a suitable payment!🤔

48/51
🇺 trout737.bsky.social
The same Cleggy who got rid of student grants.

49/51
🇺 vivaxcogitatio.bsky.social
Then so fucking be it

Humans should get paid for their labor. Period.

50/51
🇺 crystalmeh.bsky.social
Imagine if torrents had this kinda money invested 30 years ago and they were like, “asking artists and movie studios for permission is going to kill the torrent business” lol

51/51
🇺 24read-sew.bsky.social
Stealing the creative works of others is not okay. How would he feel if someone stole his AI work and collected revenue from it without permission? I mean really, the nerve of these users!

To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 
Back
Top